I found it interesting to read Bartolome de las Casas right after Alvar Nunez Cabeza de Vaca because we're starting to get a better impression of the various currents of thought on the role of Spain in the New World that were circulating amongst learned people of the time. As we found out, Cabeza de Vaca was an opportunist and a chameleon, he was able to become integrated in indigenous society when his survival depended on it, but also to step back into his European role of colonizer and evangelizer. His position on the treatment of indigenous people is ambiguous; he speaks disapprovingly of the destructive Spaniards, but he seems to be talking from the position of a would-be governor more than a humanitarian, that is, he disapproves of their ineffective governing strategy more than the poor treatment of the indigenous people. For de las Casas, on the other hand, it is clear that the suffering of the indigenous people at the hands of his countrymen pains him deeply.
In this indictment of the cruel and lawless behavior of the Spaniards, de las Casas frequently makes strong accusations such as "abominables y crueles hombres bestiales" (30). Such accusations are of course justified given the list of sadistic practices that he witnessed, but few people would have said them so boldly. de las Casas shows the absurdity of an imperial venture that is allegedly made to bring God and good governance to the people of the New World and ends up slaughtering them. He points out the hypocrisy of "los que se llaman cristianos " who commit such crimes in God's name (49). However, de las Casas never goes so far as to say that the Spanish should never have come to the New World or that they have no place there. Quite the opposite, de las Casas considered the indigenous people "muy capaces y dociles para toda buena doctrina, aptisimos para recibir nuestra santa fe catolica" (15). According to de las Casas the indigenous people deserve humane treatment, but the idea that they have a right to autonomy or cultural sovereignty is clearly far from his mind.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
Your ideas were interesting to me, because I felt the same way after reading the first half. I felt confused as to why he is so against the spanish conquest when he is so religious and loyal to the king and the crown of spain. I think he wants the people of the new world to also become subjects of the king, but not through force and abuse. He doesnt see the necessity in killing and stealing when they are willing to be taken over. This is a little bit of a condescending point of view that Las Casas has towards the Indians.
El titulo de tu blog, Serena, es muy interesante y creo que lo capta muy bien la idea fundamental de Las Casas. Aunque Las Casas crea que los cristianos estan haciendo cosas horibles a los indigenas, el todavia piensa que la idea de evangelizarlos es algo justo y la palabra de Dios. Es como..."Si solamente conocieran a Dios" los indigenias podian ser salvados.
I agree, I don’t think that De Las Casas was against the conquest. I believe he was only hoping it would be carried out less violently. I also believe that he was also writing to the king to inform him that there were problems within European Christianity. Perhaps De Las Casas believes that by writing to the king he will not only aid the Indigenous people but also help these Spanish conquerors become better Christians again.
Post a Comment